I have been thinking about this for some time, maybe even some years. Trying to put my finger on what bothers me about the nature of the discourse on mental illness, and something happened today, that helped me grasp what it is I think.
Someone said to me that, it is unfair to say that a known gun man in a mass shooting has mental illness, because you don’t know whether they might have depressive disorder, which wouldn’t make them dangerous, and that’s not fair.
And suddenly I got it. Somehow, there has been a schism in mental health reporting and talking. It has become OK to talk about, claim, write about, be aware of, be comfortable around friends who have been diagnosed with CERTAIN mental illnesses.
Now, I absolutely don’t wish to negate the suffering that ANY mental illness causes, my issue is absolutely not with that, no one’s suffering or surviving is less valuable and less painful.
I do, however, suggest that, the current standpoint *may* actually decrease stigma and improve life and opportunity for people with what are considered the “good” mental illnesses, an equivalence, if you will, to the deserving poor of yesteryear. But it seems to be INCREASING stigma for people diagnosed with the “bad” mental illnesses. You know, the ones the person talking to me was referring to, the ones we are still frightened of. Severe and Enduring mental illness, possibly including an element of psychosis.
How come this person was happy to make a distinction for reporting? Would it not have been better NOT to have referred to the mental health of the gunman? People with all manner of mental illness, even the scary illnesses, are MUCH more likely to be hurt as a result of violent crime than they are to commit such a thing.
I don’t want to distinguish experiences. A person may present at the GP and feel true terrible, while for others, the very act of being ABLE to turn up, at a specified time, and hold a conversation represents a level of wellness that they cannot imagine. These people may have the same diagnosis. People who have spent many months in psychiatric wards will have a different view of the mental health care provision than someone whose only experience is with primary care services. This does not negate either persons experience (although only one of them is having an experience of mental health care service as a distinct NHS provision)
It feels like people with more severe and enduring mental illness are being left behind while some mental illness becomes easier to talk about, and to live with (in terms of what it is possible to do, societally speaking)
Yes there is still stigma, there are still huge barriers to work and services. But these are improving. I have seen them improve in my life time of being a person with a severe and enduring mental health issue. It matters that no one is left behind. No person with mental illness asked for their health problem. No person with a mental illness is less of a person.
It matters when we speak of mental health awareness that we include all elements of that. Which is hard, I mean, no one tries to raise awareness of “Physical Health.” But, the stigma and challenge of living with mental illness of all kinds has always been so huge that, it has mattered to speak about all as one group.
Is it possible to keep speaking of this group as homogenous? Can we raise any more awareness of “mental health”? I am not sure that we can, not without in school programmes teaching children to CARE FOR their mental health, in the same way as we teach them to clean their teeth, or get their eyes tested, or hearing. I’m not sure that we can without funding to support or address not just the barest minimum of need.
I am not for splintering, and making new groups. I am just talking it through. There must come a point where raising awareness, where there needs to be a way of channeling that awareness, and providing care for the additional need it causes. It may well cause an easier world in which to live. It may improve many things, but it needs not to leave groups behind.
The cheery stories of experiencing a mental illness and getting over it, and looking back on it *are* helpful. But, what if there is no salvation? What if there is good and bad forever? That is the reality for many people. What are they supposed to learn? That they are failing to overcome an illness that actually, is there, part of the rest of their life. They are not FAILING not to be well forever. They are not even in a world in which “overcoming” is a possible outcome. These people are not less, these people NEED not to be left behind as we try and make improvements in mental health care, and acceptance of mental illness as a thing it is OK to talk about.